Who does source address validation? (was Re: what's that smell?)

Joe Abley jabley at isc.org
Wed Oct 9 17:12:12 UTC 2002



On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 11:36 Canada/Eastern, Stephen J. Wilcox 
wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>
>> Such things REALLY _NEEED_ to be broken, and the sooner the better as
>> then perhaps the offenders will fix such things sooner too, because 
>> they
>> are by definition already broken and in violation of RFC 1918 and good
>> common sense.
>
> Ok but real world calling. I have tried this and when customers find 
> something
> doesnt work on your network but it does on your competitor you make it 
> work even
> if that means breaking rules.

What services require transport of packets with RFC1918 source 
addresses across the public network?

I can think of esoteric examples of things it would be possible to do, 
but nothing that a real-world user might need (or have occasion to 
complain about).

Do you have experience of such breakage from your own customers? It 
would be interesting to hear details.


Joe




More information about the NANOG mailing list