iBGP next hop and multi-access media
jlewis at lewis.org
jlewis at lewis.org
Mon Oct 7 03:58:14 UTC 2002
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> > As others are saying... it isn't "local". It's not "local"
> > unless in the same subnet. Physical topology often correlates
> > with higher layers, but it's not strictly 1:1.
>
> Manually configuring a static route in router A would achieve the result:
> ip route 172.16.16.0 255.255.255.0 fa0/0
Why are we doing basic IP routing 101 on NANOG?
Don't route IP blocks to the ethernet. That's using ARP as your routing
protocol and it's horribly fragile. I've seen one ISP do that (they were
very technically challenged) and it's a setup that broke way too easily.
Paging Dalph Roncaster. Clean-up in aisle one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis *jlewis at lewis.org*| I route
System Administrator | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list