Spanning tree melt down ?

Stephen J. Wilcox steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Wed Nov 27 16:06:13 UTC 2002


Sure, which is why

"Within a few hours, Cisco Systems, the hospital's network provider, was loading
thousands of pounds of network equipment onto an airplane in California, bound "

seems somewhat excessive! :)

and 

"The crisis began on a Wednesday afternoon, Nov. 13, and lasted nearly four
days"

sounds like an opportunity for any consultants on nanog who have half a clue
about how to setup a LAN!

Steve

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Joe Abley wrote:

> 
> On Wednesday, Nov 27, 2002, at 10:25 Canada/Eastern, Stephen J. Wilcox 
> wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, well until the comment about STP it sounded like the guy did 
> > something
> > stupid on a program/database on a mainframe..
> >
> > I cant see how STP could do this or require that level of DR. Perhaps 
> > its just
> > the scapegoat for the Doc's mistake which he didnt want to admit!
> 
> If it's anything like any other layer-2 IT network meltdown I've seen, 
> it'll be some combination of:
> 
>   + no documentation on what the network looks like, apart from a large
>     yellow autocad diagram which was stapled to the wall in the basement
>     wiring closet in 1988
> 
>   + a scarcity of diagnostic tools, and no knowledge of how to use the
>     ones that do exist
> 
>   + complete ignorance of what traffic flows when the network is not
>     broken
> 
>   + a cable management standard that was first broken in 1988 and has
>     only been used since to pad out RFPs
> 
>   + consideration to network design which does not extend beyond the
>     reassuring knowledge that the sales guy who sold you the hardware
>     is a good guy, and will look after you
> 
>   + random unauthorised insertion of hubs and switches into the fabric
>     by users who got fed up of waiting eight months to get another
>     ethernet port installed in their lab
> 
>   + customers who have been trained by its vendors to believe that
>     certification is more important than experience
> 
>   + customers who believe in the cost benefit of a large distributed
>     layer-2 network over a large distributed (largely self-documenting)
>     layer-3 network.
> 
> Just another day at the office.
> 
> 
> Joe
> 
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list