Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this?

Mon Nov 25 18:16:34 UTC 2002

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:03:14 GMT, variable at ednet.co.uk said:
> I know that these are both legitimate IP addresses, but if they are only 
> being used for DDoS then surely we should look at locking them down (in 
> the same way as broadcast packets have been)?

We should look at locking them down the same way we've looked at locking
down broadcast packets? Or am I incorrect, and in fact Smurf attacks have
become so rare that they are once again only of theoretical interest?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20021125/a06fb6da/attachment.sig>