PAIX

Fri Nov 15 19:37:08 UTC 2002

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:20:36 EST, fkittred at gwi.net said:

> relatively cheap.  I know our costs are lower and quality is higher
> than our competitors and I believe the reason is that we go for a
> simple network designed around cheap routers and fat pipes.  We made

OK. I'll bite.  What do you define as a "cheap" router, and just as
important, what counts as a "fat" pipe where you are?  You didn't choose
the well-known router line from the well-known vendor(*) that handles
line-speed packets, as long as you don't even whisper "ingress filtering"
within it's hearing, did you?
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

(*) Yes, there's multiple answers to this one.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20021115/393d23bc/attachment.sig>