Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

Fri Nov 1 00:56:35 UTC 2002

On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:56:22PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> 
> If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically, they don't qualify.
> 

Alex,
	Even if they weren't multihomed, they have every right
to go to ARIN to request address space (provided they could
justify >= a /20 allocation).  Being multihomed only helps
build the case, but is not a requirement.

It's all on their website:

	http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv4.html#requirements

charles

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> 
> >
> > TT> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:10:01 -0600
> > TT> From: Tech Team1
> >
> >
> > TT> Since we had about 16 /24s (well utilized) this was going to
> >
> > And you didn't approach ARIN for PI space?
> >
> >
> > Eddy
> > --
> > Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
> > Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> > Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> > Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
> > To: blacklist at brics.com
> > Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
> >
> > These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
> > Do NOT send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to
> > be blocked.
> >
> 
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
> --    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --
> 
> 