Trying to find a connectivity provider that wont go under (was RE: CAIS/Ardent and now Network Access Solutions)

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Fri May 31 01:20:22 UTC 2002


On Thu, 30 May 2002 16:24:53 CDT, John Palmer <jpalmer at utilinc.com>  said:

> way too high, mostly because they have no local POPs. We really need to
> be as close to the top as possible, not because of bandwidth needs, but
> for reliability's sake.

This assumes that "the top" is any more reliable/clued/financially solvent.

Scanning the last year's archives for "chapter 11" and/or "depeering" might
be quite enlightening....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020530/e90c16f1/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list