Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems?

Thu May 23 20:31:23 UTC 2002

AR> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:17:16 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
AR> From: Alex Rubenstein

AR> Yes, ipfw/dummy is very very cool. Like, inducing a few 100
AR> msecs of latency to folks who don't pay on time :)

1. Oh, come on, I know you're more creative than _that_.  How
   about 30% packet loss on their *:53 TCP/UDP?  Or running them
   through stateful rules with uebershort timeouts?  Or simply
   having all their traffic trigger a scan (help! my firewall is
   seeing attacks to port 113!) right back at them.

2. I dub thee "Alex 'BOFH' Rubenstein".

;-)

--
Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
To: blacklist at brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.