Discussion of Results

Thu May 23 19:58:48 UTC 2002

Sounds like either way, the consensus was that ICANN has to go......which
isn't necessarily a bad thing. Very interesting.

rf

> From: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog at adns.net>
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:14:28 -0500
> To: <nanog at merit.edu>
> Subject: Discussion of Results
> 
> 
> Proposal #1 (which passed by over 2/3rds - 67.9%) expresses the sense of the
> GA that
> DOC should re-bid the ICANN contract and forget ICANN completely
> 
> Proposal #2 (which passed by 75%) expresses to ICANN the desire that they
> reform in a meaningful way, and if they don't, that the DOC should replace
> ICANN.
> 
> Interesting....
> 
> ----
> AGN Domain Name Services, Inc  http://www.adns.net
> Since 1995. The Registry for .AMERICA, .EARTH, .LION, .USA and .Z
> Define yourself or Be Defined.
> Censorship-free GA list at : http://dns-o.org/mailman/listinfo/ga
> 
> 