"portscans" (was Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product)
Greg A. Woods
woods at weird.com
Sun May 19 03:05:34 UTC 2002
[ On Saturday, May 18, 2002 at 16:03:11 (-0700), Scott Francis wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: "portscans" (was Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product)
>
> And why, pray tell, would some unknown and unaffiliated person be scanning my
> network to gather information or run recon if they were not planning on
> attacking? I'm not saying that you're not right, I'm just saying that so far
> I have heard no valid non-attack reasons for portscans (other than those run
> by network admins against their own networks).
I scan networks and hosts very regularly for legitimate diagnostic
purposes as well as occasionally for curiosity's sake. I've never
attacked any host or network that I was not directly responsible for.
If you don't want the public portions of your network mapped then you
should withdraw them from public view.
BTW, please be one heck of a lot more careful with your replies. My
original reply to you was not copied to the list and I did not give you
permission to post a response quoting my words back to the list.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <gwoods at acm.org>; <g.a.woods at ieee.org>; <woods at robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods at planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods at weird.com>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list