anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve at opaltelecom.co.uk
Mon May 6 09:29:42 UTC 2002
I have to say I think you're doing something wrong somewhere.. excluding
official role addresses I receive a handful (15ish?) spam mails per day
and I've been using some of my email addresses for years. A couple are
used on websites so they are published.
Perhaps to an extent I'm lucky, but I watch where I put my email address,
tend to use a different user when submitting web forms so I can filter if
necessary.. I've noticed the worst offenders for taking email addresses
and distributing them are things like search engine submits and online
games. All 'official/business' type sites seem to be responsible with
their email databases..
Steve
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> > We can grit our teeth and make that statement now, when spam is
> > (handwave, guess, maybe) 30% of our incoming mail load.
> >
> > It's going to become a lot harder to make as that percentage
> > approaches 99. Which it will, and probably sooner than any of us want
> > to think about.
>
> FWIW, my mother got a new email account a two weeks ago, which I just got
> around to setting her machine up to log into this afternoon. There were
> 817 pieces of mail in her inbox, of which seven weren't spam. That comes
> to 99.14%. I'm sure that'll go down a bit as she begins to use the
> account more, but I doubt it'll go down much. For it to go down to 30%,
> she'd need to receive 953 pieces of valid email each week, and I'd guess
> the actual number, from looking at her prior email account, is closer to
> 15. Which would still put us at nearly 97% spam.
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list