Internet Exchange Questions
Lane Patterson
lane at laneandmimi.com
Wed Mar 20 06:02:31 UTC 2002
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:53:23AM -0800, Jon Bennett <jonb200192865 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Is there a need for additional IXs or are there too
> many today and some should be consolidated or shut
> down altogether? If there is a need for new IXs, where
> do you put them? Who decides where to build a new IX
> and how do you get service providers to show up there
> once it is built?
>
> Thanks.
There are many types of IXes built around many different needs,
just as there are with ISPs.
Large IXes:
===========
Tend to have a number of Tier1/2/3 ISPs participating
in a wide range of peering capacity (from 10meg to GigE/OC48),
via either switch fabric (like LINX), or via mix of switch-aggregated
and private peering. Where are these located? Generally in areas
of high traffic pass-through due to continental or inter-continental
fiber routing or teledensity:
Silicon Valley, Washington DC, Chicago, NYC Metro, London, Amsterdam, Tokyo
Drivers for these large IXes tend to follow the need of Tier1/2 networks
to have multiple locations to peer so traffic engineering can be
regionalized with robust alternate paths.
For U.S. continental footprint, I would say the following
list is important for good regional granularity: Silicon Valley,
Wash D.C. Metro, NYC Metro, Dallas, Chicago, LA, and secondary:
Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, Denver.
For Europe, I believe you are seeing similar emergence of additional
large IXes in other key cities, reducing the dependence on London
and Amsterdam.
Historical IXes:
================
Peering locations that had high historical value, but are no longer
as significant as requirements and technology changed.
Local IXes:
============
Many of these are so local-to-local entities can peer without going
across more expensive regional or out-of-country links. Common
participants may be local dial providers, local small web hosters,
universities, local business and govt institutions. For many of
these players, a T1 or E1 or 10-meg port may be considered a large
investment, especially if hauled half way across a country with
low teledensity. These exchanges may be critical to the Internet
economics of these locations.
Transit IXes:
=============
These are often local IXes, where a larger ISP has also setup shop
to offer transit for non-local traffic.
Cheers,
-Lane
Lane Patterson
Research Engineer
Equinix, Inc.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list