PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)
Aditya
aditya at mighty.grot.org
Sun Mar 10 17:01:40 UTC 2002
I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for
the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design?
Adi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill!
>
> Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on
> 6-March.
>
> From the note sent out to participants on Monday:
> PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x
> PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x
>
> If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in
> number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with
> the folks at the NAP.
>
> Cheers,
> -ren
>
> At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
>
>
> >I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering
> >the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA. So you should not see
> >either 198.32.128.0 or 198.32.129.0 in your traceroutes or from
> >your peers as of 28 feb 2002.
> >
> >--bill
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list