Problems with a black hole list in the netherlands
Richard Irving
rirving at onecall.net
Sat Mar 9 13:25:10 UTC 2002
Actually, I did... I doesn't seem too on the level.
With lines like:
> Even we don't block, we just send a 471
> reply and let the monkeys determine whether the e-mail looks legitimate or spammy.
However, after explaining all this about 127.0.0.2, there is a little
note on the bottom:
>What does 127.0.0.4 mean?
>
>Not much, it's the only code we return,
>"not whitelisted" is perhaps the most accurate description.
Guess the number returned for us ?
Ironic, at least.
Were it not referenced by http://Relays.OsiruSoft.com./,
Frankly, I would care less.
* Hint * Hint *
Lionel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:04:36 -0500, Richard Irving <rirving at onecall.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello, we are currently having a problem with a vigilante block list
> >in the netherlands... I figure this is as good a forum as any....
> >
> >>The boilerplate:
> >>Please see <http://selwerd.cx/xbl/>, xbl is a *local* list, it would cost
> >>us time to check whether we can whitelist your IP.
> [...]
> >How would one approach -this- ?
>
> I would start by reading the web page in the URL you quoted. You might
> find it illuminating.
>
> --
> W
> . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
> \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
> ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list