Telco's write best practices for packet switching networks
Ron da Silva
ron at aol.net
Wed Mar 6 14:40:25 UTC 2002
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:41:55AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>
> In message <gu9ofi1rcwe.fsf at rampart.argfrp.us.uu.net>, Eric Brandwine writes:
>
> >
> >Firewalls are good things for general purpose networks. When you've
> >got a bunch of clueless employees, all using Windows shares, NFS, and
> >all sorts of nasty protocols, a firewall is best practice. Rather
> >than educate every single one of them as to the security implications
> >of their actions, just insulate them, and do what you can behind the
> >firewall.
> >
> >When you've got a deployed server, run by clueful people, dedicated to
> >a single task, firewalls are not the way to go. You've got a DNS
> >server. What are you going to do with a firewall? Permit tcp/53 and
> >udp/53 from the appropriate net blocks. Where's the protection? Turn
> >off unneeded services, chose a resilient and flame tested daemon, and
> >watch the patchlist for it.
>
> Precisely. You *may* need a packet filter to block things like SNMP
> (to name a recent case in point), but a general-purpose firewall is
> generally the wrong solution for appliance computers.
Hmm...but certainly part of the right solution for a general "appliance"
network.
-ron
More information about the NANOG
mailing list