How low can Worldcom stock go?
Marc Pierrat
marc at sunchar.com
Wed Jun 26 00:32:56 UTC 2002
Unfortunately this event will not only affect Worldcom, but the entire industry in a significant way. This is, afterall, one of the largest reported cases of fraud in US history.
MP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Deepak Jain
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:02 PM
> To: blitz; ekgermann at cctec.com
> Cc: nanog at trapdoor.merit.edu
> Subject: RE: How low can Worldcom stock go?
>
>
>
>
> I am pretty sure a 5 quarter restatement will reduce its chances of future
> respectability.
>
> DJ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> blitz
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:40 PM
> To: ekgermann at cctec.com
> Cc: nanog at trapdoor.merit.edu
> Subject: Re: How low can Worldcom stock go?
>
>
>
> Worldcom stands a chance of making money in the future, Adelphia has
> absolutely NO chance of ever regaining any sort of respectability.
>
> After all Wcom owns UUnet...they own the fat pipes..
>
> Adelphia cries when it has to purchase a few T3's cause their cablemodem
> system is clogged...
>
>
>
> At 19:03 6/25/02 -0400, you wrote:
> >Any bets where they will bottom out at? Lets see if they can
> beat Adelphia
> >at $0.05 on 6/21/02
> >
> >
> >----
> >
> > >From WSJ Tech alerts.
> >
> >WORLDCOM UNCOVERED what appears to be one of the largest corporate frauds
> in
> >history with the discovery of more than $3 billion in expenses that were
> >improperly booked as capital expenditures.
> >
> >For more information, see:
> >
> >http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1025044139757626480,00.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >=================================================================
> =========
> > Eric Germann CCTec
> > ekgermann at cctec.com Van Wert OH 45801
> > http://www.cctec.com Ph: 419 968 2640
> > Fax: 603 825 5893
> >
> >"The fact that there are actually ways of knowing and characterizing the
> >extent of one's ignorance, while still remaining ignorant, may ultimately
> be
> >more interesting and useful to people than Yarkovsky"
> >
> > -- Jon Giorgini of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
>
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list