ATTBI refuses to do reverse DNS?

Chris Woodfield rekoil at semihuman.com
Wed Jun 19 20:32:41 UTC 2002


Time Warner agreed to do so as a condition of the AOL merger. Most other cable 
companies are fighting this tooth and nail, and winning (see AT&T in Portland, 
Oregon).

-C

> Was there not once upon a time there was a proposal to require cable-cos
> to provide what would effectively be layer-2 service to any IP provider?
> 
> I think that requirement still stands in Canada, but until newer
> standards-compliant cable modems become more common it's "hard" to do
> and so nobody's doing it yet (and there is some whining on both sides).
> 
> -- 
> 								Greg A. Woods
> 
> +1 416 218-0098;  <gwoods at acm.org>;  <g.a.woods at ieee.org>;  <woods at robohack.ca>
> Planix, Inc. <woods at planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods at weird.com>



More information about the NANOG mailing list