KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.

Daniel Concepcion dani at intelideas.com
Thu Jun 6 14:31:21 UTC 2002



Yes, but there is problem about the transit for the network of the IXP
In my experience, some big providers only have the commercial view of 
internet. 
Really, if all the IXP members give some transit to the IXP for essential 
services, internet will be more robust. 

Daniel
Intelideas


On Thursday 06 June 2002 16:07, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
> As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be it's a good idea
> to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more stable than
> any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs.
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Arnold




More information about the NANOG mailing list