OC-768 availability?
Scott Granados
scott at graphidelix.net
Tue Jul 30 19:22:14 UTC 2002
Not necessarily. Don't forget that exchangecolo is in Hunters Point:)
so its not totally unusual for people to put their networks in the hood.
:)
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, David Charlap wrote:
>
> I think an OC-192 network using 56K modems in the core would be a pretty
> obvious giveaway as well.
>
> -- David
>
> Rowland, Alan D wrote:
> > Compton, CA, US and Sealand would be the giveaways.
> >
> > Scott Weeks wrote:
> >>
> >> No, he's not for real. It's a satire in the likes of Bandy Rush and such.
> >> Children need to have their fun...
> >>
> >>> dalph at hushmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I am currently running a network of cisco 2621s with the OC-192 NM for my
> >>> upstream connections. The internal network links are a mixture of K56Flex
> >>> modems and GRE tunnels.
> >>>
> >>> I am looking to upgrade to OC-768 real soon now and am wondering what the
> >>> prospects are for OC-768 availability on the 2621 platform. I've found the
> >>> 2621 to be rock-solid, except when I ping it, so I'd like to keep my network
> >>> on that platform if possible.
> >>>
> >>> In addition, if anyone knows the availability of OC-768 circuits between the
> >>> following cities I'd appreciate any fiber maps and an approximate price
> >>> range:
> >>> Ottawa, ON, CA
> >>> Midland, ON, CA
> >>> Goderich, ON, CA
> >>> Toronto, ON, CA
> >>> Compton, CA, US
> >>> Sealand
> >>>
> >>> At each site I plan to announce a /24 from a /20 I was allocated so if
> >>> everyone could please update their prefix filters now that would be great.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >>> -- Dalph Roncaster
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list