verio arrogance

Ralph Doncaster ralph at istop.com
Sat Jul 27 02:49:21 UTC 2002


> > I'm a little disappointed you're wasting list bandwidth after this has
> > been well discussed, and not a single post has offered a better
> > technical alternative to de-aggregating my ARIN /20 (given my network
> > topology).
> > 
> > -Ralph
> 
> Announce your largest aggregate, and announce more-specifics tagged
> no-export to those peers who agree to accept them?

Which is worse than announcing just the more specifics to 2 different
transit providers in 2 different cities.

> Upgrade the connectivity between your sites?
Technically sound, economically stupid.  You offering to pony up the
$5K/mth for an OC3 so I can have a redundant link between Ottawa and
Toronto?

Besides the technical aspects of my network, I didn't see any proof that
relaxed prefix filtering (and no I'm not saying accept /32's - the more
specifics I got Verio to accept were /23's) would cause significant
(i.e. >30%) routing table bloat when that was recently discussed.

-Ralph





More information about the NANOG mailing list