PSINet/Cogent Latency

Alex Rubenstein alex at nac.net
Tue Jul 23 01:49:04 UTC 2002



You certainly would, except for the fact that the provider is in
bankruptcy and won't/can't answer the phone.

We wanted to do an oc3 or oc12 or gig-e, but that was replied to with,
"wha?"



On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Brian wrote:

> bwahaha, 2 funnee.  I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding
> another ds3 at that point.
>
>     Bri
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr at isprime.com>
> To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <alex at nac.net>
> Cc: <nanog at merit.edu>
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM
> Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency
>
>
> >
> > 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
> >
> > --Phil
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > Alex Rubenstein
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM
> > To: Derek Samford
> > Cc: nanog at merit.edu
> > Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years,
> > and it's never been as bad as it is now.
> >
> > oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that
> > loaded (35 to 40 mb/s).
> >
> > Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss,
> > during business hours.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
> > having
> > > latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by
> > > Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were
> > > experiencing earlier?
> > >
> > > Derek
> > >
> >
> > -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
> > --    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --
> >
> >
> >
>

-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --





More information about the NANOG mailing list