Requirement to store email for 90 days.
Johannes Ullrich
jullrich at sans.org
Mon Jul 22 16:37:31 UTC 2002
>From the same URL:
"The bill encourages ISPs to report suspicious activity on their networks
(whatever that might be), even if it poses no immediate threat, and shield
them from lawsuits from anyone"
so just forward the spam to the authorities... after all, it is suspicous.
Maybe some Al Quaida steggo hiding in it?
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:17:27 -0400 (EDT)
"John Fraizer" <tvo at EnterZone.Net> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/26217.html
>
> "Service providers are also required to keep customer records, including
> emails, for 90 days, under the bill." "The bill has to go to Senate,
> where it is expected to receive little opposition, before becoming law."
>
> Talk to your senators folks. See if they're going to pay for the disk
> arrays required to store 90 days worth of SPAM for each and every one of
> your customers.
>
> I suggest that congress get the spammers under control prior to enacting
> legislation that requires us to archive all email for 90 days.
>
> ---
> John Fraizer | High-Security Datacenter Services |
> EnterZone, Inc | Dedicated circuits 64k - 155M OC3 |
> http://www.enterzone.net/ | Virtual, Dedicated, Colocation |
>
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
jullrich at sans.org Collaborative Intrusion Detection
join http://www.dshield.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020722/b2738cba/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list