Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its annoying and no one can see your message

Pawlukiewicz Jane pawlukiewicz_jane at bah.com
Wed Jul 10 14:23:32 UTC 2002


HA!

I remember pegasus! That was ages ago. 

before windows... Our branch got all macs (the really old shoebox ones)
before we'd succumb but we were over ruled eventually. They have them in
the smithsonian now.

enough ot.  back to work.

Jane

"Gerardo A. Gregory" wrote:
> 
> Guess no one uses Pegasus Mail anymore,
> 
> *reminiscence of the good ol days when that was all that the Department of
> Defense used*
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <up at 3.am>
> To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa at samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
> Cc: <nanog at merit.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its
> annoying and no one can see your message
> 
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> >
> > > Of the remaining 9638, there are 523 unique X-Mailer
> > > references.  I disqualified 24 for being quoted, or random
> > > X-Mailer discussion on NANOG.  (X-Mailer discussion seems
> > > to be the ONLY thread that hasn't repeated itself in the
> > > last month.)
> > >
> > > The breakdown:
> > >
> > > Microsoft 38.71% (not even half the way to 90%)
> > > Mozilla 11.41%
> > > Eudora 10.86%
> > > ELM 6.63%
> > > exmh 5.25%
> > > Web Mail 5.20%
> > > Mutt 4.70%
> > > New MH 3.64%
> > > VM 2.36%
> > > Mulberry 1.90%
> > > Gnus 1.27%
> > > MH 0.96%
> > >
> > > If we include the postings with no X-Mailer in the sample,
> > > Microsoft drops to 18.08% of the total -- I'm not aware of any
> > > M$ email product that didn't include an X-Mailer header.
> > >
> > > Of course, about the only thing you can conclude from this
> > > is that people with no X-Mailer post more often than anyone else ;)
> >
> > Most of those are likely pine, which you can tell by looking at the
> > message-id...
> >
> > James Smallacombe       PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
> > up at 3.am     http://3.am
> > =========================================================================
> >



More information about the NANOG mailing list