Just an FYI - Apache Worm on the loose

Tue Jul 9 21:46:47 UTC 2002

Not having seen a copy of the other worm, I wouldn't know.  Regardless, would
you want a worm, even a weak and ineffective one on your boxes?

-j

On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:29:41PM -0700, Patrick Thomas wrote:
> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Patrick Thomas <root at utility.clubscholarship.com>
> To: Jason Legate <jlegate at alienchick.com>
> Cc: <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Just an FYI - Apache Worm on the loose
> 
> 
> Is this a new apache worm, or the one that was circulating a week or so
> ago that was described as weak and ineffective ?
> 
> thanks.
> 
---end quoted text---

-- 
Jason Legate (W6SN)
Sr. Net/Sys Admin, eVine, Inc.
work- jlegate at evine.com | home- jlegate at alienchick.com
Key Fingerprint: 4FB4 2228 DE63 3BBA 7B72  40DD 13D5 2547 821D 2909
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020709/bdc04d20/attachment.sig>