AS path fugliness?
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Wed Jul 3 19:48:31 UTC 2002
This has disappeared from here...
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> I see the same from AS 16517 -
>
> *> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
> 3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
>
> Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
> Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
>
> Regards
> Marshall Eubanks
>
>
> Mike Lewinski wrote:
>
>> Of course it would be towards the end of the table.
>>
>> Here's a sample of the more detailed log at
>> http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html
>>
>> *>i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
>> {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
>> 6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
>> 957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
>> 13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
>> 9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
>> 215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
>> 17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
>> 1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
>> 191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
>> 23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
>>
>> * i a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
>> {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
>> 6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
>> 957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
>> 13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
>> 9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
>> 215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
>> 17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
>> 1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
>> 191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
>> 23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
>>
>>
>> * e.f.g.h 25 0 701 3561 23037
>> {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
>> 6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
>> 957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
>> 13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
>> 9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
>> 215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
>> 17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
>> 1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
>> 191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
>> 23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
>>
>>
>> neighbor ids's are munged, otherwise it's a straight dump of what we're
>> getting. I've gotten two other confirmations as well.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mike Lewinski" <mike at rockynet.com>
>> To: <nanog at merit.edu>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:46 AM
>> Subject: AS path fugliness?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
>>>
>>> Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>> Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 270
>>> Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 274
>>> Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>> Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>> Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 270
>>> Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>> Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>> Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>> Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 270
>>> Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
>>> aspath, requested size 268
>>>
>>> (per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml )
>>>
>>> It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some
>>>
>> kind
>>
>>> of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out
>>>
>> who,
>>
>>> thus far longest I've found is about 20.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
This e-mail may contain confidential and proprietary information of
Multicast Technologies, Inc, subject to Non-Disclosure Agreements
T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail : tme at multicasttech.com
http://www.multicasttech.com
Test your network for multicast :
http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
Status of Multicast on the Web :
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
More information about the NANOG
mailing list