SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

EA Louie elouie at
Thu Jan 31 22:06:29 UTC 2002

> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> > It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> > spent on this witch hunt.
> At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
> now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
> I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
> mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.

assuming that they pull the plug prior to warning the accussed offender of
the problem.  They'd get no false positive from me, that's for sure  ;-)
Guilty as charged here.

Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free address at

More information about the NANOG mailing list