Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
andy at tigerteam.net
Thu Jan 31 15:05:33 UTC 2002
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Martin J. Levy wrote:
> I got this forwarded to me. I'm not impressed.
> Based upon the general desire for providers to have NAT'ed users and to
> reduce IP-space usage where appropriate, does this make sense? I can
> understand the providers desire to increase revenue, but I don't believe
> this is a good way to do it.
Slashdot, the tabloid of the tech world. I believe if you read through all
the comments no one ever came up with any proof of this and reading
through Commcast's AUP doesn't reveal this policy either. I think it was
PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp
More information about the NANOG