Peter Ford peterf at
Wed Jan 30 08:22:21 UTC 2002

Looks like all of you can use the scheduled time to establish a glossary
so that you understand why you are at the NAP BoF.  

Or perhaps there needs to be a liaison established to an established
Internet Etymology and Terminology Forum.

Apologies in advance and in arrears, peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Alan Hannan
Cc: nanog at
Subject: Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF

> Something bothers me about this thread, and I think it is the
> assertion that there is a proper definition for 'NAP' as
> differentiated from 'IXP' or what not.

yup.  george santayana was right

More information about the NANOG mailing list