traffic filtering
J.F. Noonan
jfn at msc.com
Tue Jan 22 20:47:15 UTC 2002
Never mind. Brain several iterations behind keyboard. It was
kindly pointed out to me offlist. I will now return to lurking
where I belong.
thx,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 at 1:57pm J.F. Noonan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 at 12:34pm Joe Abley wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:53:16PM -0500, Stephen Griffin wrote:
> > > I'm curious about how many networks completely filter all traffic to
> > > any ip address ending in either ".0" or ".255".
> >
> > I heard recently that Windows 2000 will refuse to send packets
> > to addresses with the least-significant octet 255, if the most-
> > significant octet indicates the address lies in a pre-CIDR class
> > C. So, for example, 192.168.0.255 would be unreachable from a
> > windows 2000 machine, regardless of the fact that it might be
> > a legitimate host numbered within 192.168.0.0/23.
>
>
> Not true. M$ is guilty of many evil things, but not this one.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joseph F. Noonan
> Rigaku/MSC Inc.
> jfn at msc.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
> (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
>
> C:\>tracert o2
>
> Tracing route to o2.msc.com [12.110.0.218]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>
> 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms netb.msc.com [192.246.38.10]
> 2 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 172.16.16.2
> 3 <10 ms 10 ms <10 ms 12.124.26.249
> 4 <10 ms 10 ms <10 ms gbr2-p51.hs1tx.ip.att.net [12.123.134.18]
> 5 <10 ms <10 ms 10 ms gbr3-p40.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.2.97]
> 6 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms gbr4-p60.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.1.138]
> 7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms gbr4-p50.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.2.102]
> 8 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms gbr1-p20.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.5.22]
> 9 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms ar1-p3110.slkut.ip.att.net [12.123.207.5]
> 10 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms 12.127.107.26
> 11 50 ms 40 ms 60 ms fw-utah.msc.com [12.110.0.130]
> 12 40 ms 40 ms 60 ms o2.msc.com [12.110.0.218]
>
> Trace complete.
>
> C:\>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list