ICANN dead?
Christopher Schulte
schulte+nanog-post at nospam.schulte.org
Thu Jan 17 04:15:09 UTC 2002
At 07:23 PM 1/16/2002 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>Just another example of the guardians of "Internet stability" exhibiting
>their true level of suitability for the task.
Oh please. Didn't we go over this mid November, 2001?
http://www.icann.org/ ( which is available from my workstation just fine,
by the way ) is not a critical part of the operational stability of the
internet as a whole. It may have been unavailable. If so, big deal. Move on.
Enough said.
>/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> Patrick Greenwell
> Stealthgeeks,LLC. Operations Consulting
> http://www.stealthgeeks.net
>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
--chris
More information about the NANOG
mailing list