SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
elouie at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 31 22:06:29 UTC 2002
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> > It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> > spent on this witch hunt.
> At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
> now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
> I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
> mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
assuming that they pull the plug prior to warning the accussed offender of
the problem. They'd get no false positive from me, that's for sure ;-)
Guilty as charged here.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the NANOG