SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

M. David Leonard mdl at equinox.shaysnet.com
Thu Jan 31 19:11:33 UTC 2002


	Well, if you offer "unlimited" access then, yes, they should be 
allowed to stay on 24x7 if they want to.  Look up "unlimited" in your 
Funk & Wagnalls - my Websters says it means "infinite, boundless, without 
restriction."  That's why ShaysNet only offers "unmetered occasional" 
access.  I suppose it would be asking too much for the FTC to investigate 
the possibility of consumer fraud in offerings of "unlimited" access.


					David Leonard
					ShaysNet



On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Steven J. Sobol wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:
> 
> > It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100% of
> > what they pay for.
> 
> So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
> $20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?
> 
> -- 
> JustThe.net LLC - Steve "Web Dude" Sobol, CTO      ICQ: 56972932/WebDude216
> website: http://JustThe.net  email: sjsobol at JustThe.net  phone: 216.619.2NET 
> postal: 5686 Davis Drive, Mentor On The Lake, OH 44060-2752  DalNet: ZX-2
> 
> 
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list