zebra/ospf issue

Josh Gentry jgentry at swcp.com
Sun Feb 17 16:50:07 UTC 2002



This is apparently not an appropriate topic for the nanog list.  You will
see no more.  Thank you.

Josh


On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:37:35PM -0700, Josh Gentry wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'm experimenting with using Zebra running on a Debian box to do OSPF with
> the Ciscos on our network.  The zebra box has 2 interfaces, each in a
> different area.  This is the first time we have tried to impliment
> multiple areas on our network.  Right now, area 51 consists only of the
> zebra box and a Cisco 2500, and is just for testing.
> 
> The zebra box is forming a full adjacency with the Cisco in area 51 with
> no problems.  It will not, however, become fully adjacent with the DR and
> BDR in area 0.  This seems to be preventing the distrobution of routes to
> the zebra box.
> 
> Distrobution of routes in area 51 works fine.
> 
> Here is my config, minus auth info.
> 
> ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
> !   2002/02/02 16:35:11
> !
> hostname ospfd
> log file /var/log/zebra/ospfd.log
> service password-encryption
> !
> !
> interface lo
> !
> interface eth1
>  ip ospf authentication-key <password>
> !
> interface eth0
>  ip ospf message-digest-key <keyid> md5 <password>
>  ip ospf priority 5
>  ip ospf hello-interval 10
>  ip ospf dead-interval 40
> 
> !
> router ospf
>  ospf router-id 216.184.8.55
>  ospf abr-type cisco
>  ospf rfc1583compatibility
>  network 198.59.115.0/24 area 0
>  network 216.184.8.0/24 area 51
>  area 0 authentication message-digest
>  area 51 authentication
>  redistribute static
> 
> 
> Any insight would be appreciated.  Thanks.
> 
> Josh
> jgentry at systemstability.org
> 

-- 




More information about the NANOG mailing list