zebra/ospf issue
Josh Gentry
jgentry at swcp.com
Sun Feb 17 16:50:07 UTC 2002
This is apparently not an appropriate topic for the nanog list. You will
see no more. Thank you.
Josh
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:37:35PM -0700, Josh Gentry wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm experimenting with using Zebra running on a Debian box to do OSPF with
> the Ciscos on our network. The zebra box has 2 interfaces, each in a
> different area. This is the first time we have tried to impliment
> multiple areas on our network. Right now, area 51 consists only of the
> zebra box and a Cisco 2500, and is just for testing.
>
> The zebra box is forming a full adjacency with the Cisco in area 51 with
> no problems. It will not, however, become fully adjacent with the DR and
> BDR in area 0. This seems to be preventing the distrobution of routes to
> the zebra box.
>
> Distrobution of routes in area 51 works fine.
>
> Here is my config, minus auth info.
>
> ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
> ! 2002/02/02 16:35:11
> !
> hostname ospfd
> log file /var/log/zebra/ospfd.log
> service password-encryption
> !
> !
> interface lo
> !
> interface eth1
> ip ospf authentication-key <password>
> !
> interface eth0
> ip ospf message-digest-key <keyid> md5 <password>
> ip ospf priority 5
> ip ospf hello-interval 10
> ip ospf dead-interval 40
>
> !
> router ospf
> ospf router-id 216.184.8.55
> ospf abr-type cisco
> ospf rfc1583compatibility
> network 198.59.115.0/24 area 0
> network 216.184.8.0/24 area 51
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 51 authentication
> redistribute static
>
>
> Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Josh
> jgentry at systemstability.org
>
--
More information about the NANOG
mailing list