SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

Fri Feb 1 02:57:43 UTC 2002

> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:18:31 +0800
> From: Adrian Chadd <adrian at creative.net.au>

> Personally, I think that would be wonderful for Residential
> Cable/DSL services - there's only going to be a (relatively)
> small number of your userbase that will ever be affected by
> the bandwidth limiting, and you're still providing "unlimited"
> connectivity to whatever you deem as "local" ..

That's something I'd also thought of.  Ratelimiting with
logarithmic aging and a long half-life... it would be more gentle
than a cap that kicks in after, say, 30 seconds.

Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
To: blacklist at brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.