Operational Issues with 18.104.22.168/8...
hnarayan at cs.ucsd.edu
Wed Dec 11 00:04:16 UTC 2002
It would require a PKI and also require every router to support it.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Harsha Narayan wrote:
> > Key databases:
> > Using cryptography to authenticate routing updates gets messy very soon.
> > Then, there will again be the same problem of the Public Key Infrastucture
> > not getting updated or something like that.
> Hard to do it right, yes, but not impossible. (Actually I did strong
> crypto for a living last few years, so I think I have somewhat informed
> opinion on the subject :)
More information about the NANOG