Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...

Fri Dec 6 20:29:59 UTC 2002

Sorry, which operational aliases did the RIRs announce before they started
allocating addreses?

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:
> IMHO - The RIRs are doing their part. They announce to the operations
> aliases their intention to allocate a new block before they start doing
> it. People like me (with the ingress-prefix-template), Rob Thomas (with
> the bogon template), and Steve Gill (with the Junos flavor of the
> ingress-prefix-template) start tweaking our templates and post them to
> the community.
>
> After that, it would be up to each operations team to execute within
> their own network.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> Adam "Tauvix" Debus
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:16 PM
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
>
>
> >
> > So for the sake of argument, in your proposal an ISP could filter all
> of
> > the blocks that the RIRs allocate out of and hamstring them
> indefinitely?
> >
>
>     Perhaps not, but an X month period after the inital allocation to
> the
> RIR where they don't assign out of that pool might be wise. Perhaps
> e-mails
> can be sent to the registered contacts of existing IP space upon initial
> allocation, on the first of each month, and then on the last day of the
> hold.
>
>     I know that I am sometimes a bit too busy to take care of something
> like
> that at the very instant I get the e-mail, and that it can fall to the
> wayside. Many times a reminder e-mail has come at a moment where I was
> able
> do to something about it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam "Tauvix" Debus
> Linux Certified Professional, Linux Certified Administrator #447641
> Network Administrator, ReachONE Internet
> adam at reachone.com
>
>
>