Praise to XO's Security/Abuse

Sat Aug 31 00:25:52 UTC 2002

On 04:36 PM 8/30/02, John M. Brown wrote:
 >
 >
 >Jason at XO's security/abuse staff.  Very helpful chap

Indeed he is.  Which is why I'm totally mystified about why rfc-ignorant 
insists that my domain doesn't have a working abuse address.  I would 
privately email the admin at rfc-ignorant about this problem, but, well.... 
(see below)

jc

 >From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON at wellington.cnchost.com>
 >Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
 >Message-ID: <200208262053.QAA27667 at wellington.cnchost.com>
 >Errors-To: <MAILER-DAEMON at wellington.cnchost.com>
 >To: <lists at vo.cnchost.com>
 >Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
 >X-UIDL: 59729
 >
 >The original message was received at Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
 >from adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net [208.201.244.240]
 >
 >   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
 ><admin at rfc-ignorant.com>
 >
 >   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
 >... while talking to narn.megacity.org.:
 >>>> RCPT To:<admin at rfc-ignorant.com>
 ><<< 550 5.7.1 <admin at rfc-ignorant.com>... Message rejected because the
 >connecting host (wellington.concentric.net) does not have abuse contact -
 >see www.rfc-ignorant.org
 >550 <admin at rfc-ignorant.com>... User unknown
 >
 >   ----- Original message follows -----
 >
 >Return-Path: <lists at vo.cnchost.com>
 >Received: from Erwin.vo.cnchost.com (adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net
 >[208.201.244.240])
 >	by wellington.cnchost.com
 >	id QAA27406; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
 >	[ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
 >Errors-To: <lists at vo.cnchost.com>
 >Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20020826135320.02fa2340 at pop3.vo.cnchost.com>
 >X-Sender: lists%vo.cnchost.com at pop3.vo.cnchost.com
 >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
 >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:55:30 -0700
 >To: admin at rfc-ignorant.com
 >From: JC Dill <abuse at vo.cnchost.com>
 >Subject: Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown
 >Mime-Version: 1.0
 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
 >
 >Can you explain why rfc-ignorant thinks my domain doesn't have a working
 >abuse address?
 >
 >jc