Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at

Brad Knowles brad.knowles at skynet.be
Tue Aug 27 21:14:45 UTC 2002


At 9:45 PM -0600 2002/08/26, David Van Duzer wrote:

>  Not to try to undercut the general point, but that would imply that
>  Earthlink, AOL, and MSN (for examples) should have a combined abuse
>  department of roughly 1500 employees.

	Last I checked, AOL itself had over 6000 employees, of which 5000 
were the help desk.  The other 1000 were the rest of the company, and 
the Operations group had something over 100 (many of the rest were in 
Development).  The Abuse department was an entire division of 
something like a couple dozen people, and was divided into multiple 
groups -- one handled USENET abuse, one handled e-mail abuse, etc.... 
This was back when AOL still had only about eight or nine million 
users.

	Ghu only knows what the numbers are like today.

>                              Perhaps the real social problem is
>  convincing whatever standards bodies and vendors necessary that it is a
>  technical problem.

	No, this is wrong.  It is not a technical problem.  Any technical 
"solution" you apply will have any of several technical work-arounds 
that can be relatively easily discovered, and probably within the 
span of just a few hours early on Saturday morning -- so that they've 
got the rest of the weekend to generate spam using their "new and 
improved" tools, and then a few months to make a killing on selling 
their new versions to the even more clueless.

>                      There seems to be far too much apathy (FUD?) rather
>  than just designing a partial solution, however imperfect, and
>  implementing it.

	The problem is a social one, and the only real solutions will be 
socio-legal in nature.  They may have technical implementations, but 
that is the only respect in which technology is employed.


	Fundamentally, you can't implement a policy until you actually 
have a policy.  The setting of the policy is a socio-legal problem, 
the implementation of the policy may have technical aspects.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)



More information about the NANOG mailing list