IPv6 Interview Questions and critic
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Tue Aug 27 21:07:14 UTC 2002
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:43:38 -0400
Peter John Hill <peterjhill at cmu.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 10:41 AM, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > Ipv6 uses 128 bits to provide addressing, routing and identification
> > information on a computer. The 128-bits are divided into the left-64
> > and
> > the right-64. Ipv6 uses the right 64 bits to store an IEEE defined
> > global
> > identifier (EUI64). This identifier is composed of company id value
> > assigned to a manufacturer by the IEEE Registration Authority. The
> > 64-bit
> > identifier is a concatenation of the 24-bit company_id value and a
> > 40-bit
> > extension identifier assigned by the organization with that company_id
> > assignment. The 48-bit MAC address of your network interface card is
> > also
> > used to make up the EUI64.
>
> Since it so easy for a host (relative to ipv4) to have multiple ip
> addresses, I like what Microsoft has done. If told by a router, a Win
> XP box will assign itself a global unicast address using EUI-64. It
> will also create a global unicast anonymous address. This will not be
> tied to the hardware, and the OS will also limit how long it uses that
Wasn't this described in an Internet draft ? Do you know what the status is -
I cannot seem to find it.
Marshall
> address before deprecating that address and creating a new preferred
> anonymous address. I can see servers using the EUI-64 address, while
> clients use the anonymous address. It will allow servers to narrow down
> who is accessing their servers to a 64 bit subnet. That will be good
> enough for most statistics, but will make it more difficult to do the
> scarier tracking of users.
>
> I have noticed that the Linux and Mac OS X ipv6 implementations so not
> create the private addresses automatically.
> Peter Hill
> Network Engineer
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list