Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org)
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Mon Aug 26 19:27:05 UTC 2002
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:12:40 +0200, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> said:
> IMHO, Paul's idea is quite a good one, but all servers will need to be
> upgraded, and all dns entries installed.
Given the number of providers who seem to think ingress and/or rfc1918
filtering shouldn't be done, what makes you think that "all servers"
will be upgraded to support THIS proposal?
(If you don't want to re-start the RFC1918 war, feel free to substitute ANY
OTHER thing that most people think is a Good Thing, but we've seen some
sizable minority not deploy for reasons they consider perfectly valid).
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020826/0b48c635/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list