IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Aug 22 03:16:39 UTC 2002
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:08:52 +0200, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles at skynet.be> said:
> It's bad enough waiting for DNS responses so that you can
> determine whether or not the envelope sender domain even exists. Now
> you want to slow down every single e-mail transaction by many, many,
> many orders of magnitude so that you can do a callback on each and
> every connection?!?
Worse yet, under his proposal, you're calling back to a callback address
provided by the spammer on the MAIL FROM, to verify a spammer-provided token.
What's wrong with this picture?
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020821/39f4296a/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list