Echo

Fri Aug 16 19:43:08 UTC 2002

Brad Knowles(brad.knowles at skynet.be)@2002.08.16 19:48:10 +0000:
> 	What kinds of anti-abuse protection methods have people used for 
> "echo" accounts that they have set up?

- scoreboard: one mail from one source addres in one minute time window
- gnupg: mail needs to be signed to fire a return mail. key of the
  signer must belong to the robot's gpg trust web.


regards,
/k

-- 
> To avoid criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. --Elbert Hubbard
WebMonster Community Project -- Reliable and quick since 1998 -- All on BSD
http://www.webmonster.de/ - ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ - http://www.rohrbach.de/
GnuPG:   0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4  A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6
REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C  5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44
My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/
Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 10x
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020816/f3fbb836/attachment.sig>