Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?)

Joe Wood joew at accretive-networks.net
Fri Aug 16 01:33:01 UTC 2002


On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Mark Kent wrote:

> We'ld prefer that such ISPs identify themselves here so we can
> straighten them out.  Wasn't that your intention when you asked this
> question:
>
>     How many of you that currently do not filter your customer BGP
>     sessions have max-prefixes configured?
>
> That seemed to me to be a small trick to get unsuspecting ISPs to
> wave their hands "Over here!", so that we could whack'em.

;>

Actually, my intent was to get more of a representation on who actually
cares enough to try and prevent these leaks that I see from my peers
frequently. Those that don't really do anything to prevent these leaks
would be the peers that I would begin doing agressive filtering on our
sessions.

I would think that all the ISP's represented on this list get wacked
enough on other list topics, they probably don't need any more beatings
about this....


Take care,

Joe




More information about the NANOG mailing list