Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore?

Richard A Steenbergen ras at e-gerbil.net
Sat Aug 10 21:55:17 UTC 2002


On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 05:42:32PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> 
> > What is the current max speed of frame relay in any common vendor
> > implementation (I'm talking routers here).
> 
> Doesn't OC48 POS on GSR and Jewniper do FR?

Welcome to MAE Chicago/New York, http://www.mae.net/FE/. But M160's and
OC48 ports are expensive, I suspect its overkill for the amount of traffic
that will actually be exchanged there.

I do wonder why most GigE exchange points are still doing single lan 
segment peering instead of having a peermaker type service for dynamic 
vlan configurations. Manual configuration is slow and a pain, and with 
some of them charging you per-vlan what it would cost for a copper 
crossconnect, it's no wonder most people don't use them.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)



More information about the NANOG mailing list