Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore?
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Sat Aug 10 15:20:44 UTC 2002
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> If the software MTBF would be better, convergence would not be an issue.
> As long as it's an operational hazard to run core boxes (with some
> vendors anyway) with older piece of code than six months, you end up
> engineering convergence into the networks.
Odd, I think most people would say it's an operational hazard to run code
newer than 6 months old, or at least with less than 6 months of testing on
any particular image.
How they're able to completely break so many critically important things
within 2 weeks between a bugfix code rev is still beyond me. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list