Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore?

Richard A Steenbergen ras at e-gerbil.net
Sat Aug 10 15:20:44 UTC 2002


On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> 
> If the software MTBF would be better, convergence would not be an issue.
> As long as it's an operational hazard to run core boxes (with some
> vendors anyway)  with older piece of code than six months, you end up
> engineering convergence into the networks.

Odd, I think most people would say it's an operational hazard to run code
newer than 6 months old, or at least with less than 6 months of testing on
any particular image.

How they're able to completely break so many critically important things
within 2 weeks between a bugfix code rev is still beyond me. :)

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)



More information about the NANOG mailing list