NANOG, its decline in s/n

Thu Aug 8 21:45:29 UTC 2002

On Thu, 08 Aug 2002 14:32:14 PDT, Scott Granados said:
> I think you have some really good points.  I think a lot of us have 
> fairly dark but similar senses of humor.  Its likely that  aybe people 
> not used to this take things the wrong way sometimes.  I'm however not 
> against being operation or careful and respectful but I actually enjoy 
> some of the tongue and cheek responses on here.  

I've said it about the IETF list, but it's equally applicable here.

The average poster has a fairly high chance of not being "all there" - which
is not surprising, as this is a self-reinforcing state in our industry.
After all - most of us have as our claim to fame the ability to talk to
inanimate objects and convince them they want to listen to us.
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20020808/020500b9/attachment.sig>