operational context? Re: signature
Scott Granados
scott at graphidelix.net
Thu Aug 8 00:42:52 UTC 2002
Hmmm, do pgp sig's count and aren't they longer?
I still like the idea that using longer sigs will use up extra unused
fiber:)
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jim
Mercer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:51:18AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > At 6:28 PM -0400 2002/08/07, William Warren wrote:
> > > My sig is now 4 lines.
> >
> > It's not just the total number of lines. It's also about the
> > number of characters on each line -- .sigs should generally be
> > wrapped at 72-75 characters, just like e-mail messages.
>
> i'm certainly glad the moderator of the list is watching to make sure
> people don't drone on endlessly about such non-operational issues such as
> SPAM.
>
> the length of one's signature and/or expressing one's religious
> beliefs must have some obscure operational context.
>
> --jim
> fully expecting to have posting privileges revoked for another 6 months.
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list