operational context? Re: signature

Scott Granados scott at graphidelix.net
Thu Aug 8 00:42:52 UTC 2002


Hmmm, do pgp sig's count and aren't they longer?

I still like the idea that using longer sigs will use up extra unused 
fiber:)
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jim 
Mercer wrote:

> 
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:51:18AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > At 6:28 PM -0400 2002/08/07, William Warren wrote:
> > > My sig is now 4 lines.
> > 
> > 	It's not just the total number of lines.  It's also about the 
> > number of characters on each line -- .sigs should generally be 
> > wrapped at 72-75 characters, just like e-mail messages.
> 
> i'm certainly glad the moderator of the list is watching to make sure
> people don't drone on endlessly about such non-operational issues such as
> SPAM.
> 
> the length of one's signature and/or expressing one's religious
> beliefs must have some obscure operational context.
> 
> --jim
> fully expecting to have posting privileges revoked for another 6 months.
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list