operational context? Re: signature

Thu Aug 8 00:25:30 UTC 2002

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:51:18AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:28 PM -0400 2002/08/07, William Warren wrote:
> > My sig is now 4 lines.
> 
> 	It's not just the total number of lines.  It's also about the 
> number of characters on each line -- .sigs should generally be 
> wrapped at 72-75 characters, just like e-mail messages.

i'm certainly glad the moderator of the list is watching to make sure
people don't drone on endlessly about such non-operational issues such as
SPAM.

the length of one's signature and/or expressing one's religious
beliefs must have some obscure operational context.

--jim
fully expecting to have posting privileges revoked for another 6 months.