my sig
Scott Granados
scott at graphidelix.net
Wed Aug 7 22:26:45 UTC 2002
Well as long as under God is kept out of your sig then the 9th circuit
court should leave you alone!
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Dominic J. Eidson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, William Warren wrote:
>
> > the sig is removed....I am saddened that my sig was/is considered
> > obnoxious and self-indulging. I appreciate the explanations.
>
> There have been much longer much more obnoxious .sig's on this list
> before, with no complaints. Go figure, let the anti-religious bigots rule.
>
> IMNSHO, the only valid reason for complaining about the .sig, was the
> more-than-4-lines length, but it's fairly obvious that that wasn't the
> (main) reason...
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list