my sig

Scott Granados scott at graphidelix.net
Wed Aug 7 22:26:45 UTC 2002


Well as long as under God is kept  out of your sig then the 9th circuit 
court should leave you alone!

On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Dominic J. Eidson wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, William Warren wrote:
> 
> > the sig is removed....I am saddened that my sig was/is considered
> > obnoxious and self-indulging.  I appreciate the explanations.
> 
> There have been much longer much more obnoxious .sig's on this list
> before, with no complaints. Go figure, let the anti-religious bigots rule.
> 
> IMNSHO, the only valid reason for complaining about the .sig, was the
> more-than-4-lines length, but it's fairly obvious that that wasn't the
> (main) reason...
> 
> 
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list