Best provider to use ?
Howard C. Berkowitz
hcb at gettcomm.com
Mon Apr 8 17:11:44 UTC 2002
>Of all the places to try to get away with this type of thing....
>It's like {insert your favorite comparision here}....
A modernized version of Chief Joseph and the Trail of Tiers?
>
>
>At 05:48 PM 4/6/2002 -0500, Daniel Golding wrote:
>
>>Even better...the anonymous trolls!
>>
>>- Dan
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On
>>> Behalf Of measl at mfn.org
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:30 PM
>>> To: internetguy205 at hotmail.com
>>> Cc: nanog at merit.edu
>>> Subject: Re: Best provider to use ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, internetguy205 at hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> > Out of the Tier 1s who is the best to use ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>>
>>> Please don't feed the trolls...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yours,
>>> J.A. Terranson
>>> sysadmin at mfn.org
>>>
>>> If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human
>>> beings, they should give serious consideration towards
>>> setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than
>>> consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which
>>> the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the
>>> first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and
>>> elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction
>>> of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic
>>> and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely
>>> wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out
>>> the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
>>>
>>> The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my
>>> employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the
>>> opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a
>>> problem to bitch about in the first place...
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list