Best provider to use ?

Howard C. Berkowitz hcb at gettcomm.com
Mon Apr 8 17:11:44 UTC 2002


>Of all the places to try to get away with this type of thing.... 
>It's like {insert your favorite comparision here}....


A modernized version of Chief Joseph and the Trail of Tiers?

>
>
>At 05:48 PM 4/6/2002 -0500, Daniel Golding wrote:
>
>>Even better...the anonymous trolls!
>>
>>- Dan
>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On
>>>  Behalf Of measl at mfn.org
>>>  Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:30 PM
>>>  To: internetguy205 at hotmail.com
>>>  Cc: nanog at merit.edu
>>>  Subject: Re: Best provider to use ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, internetguy205 at hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>  > Out of the Tier 1s who is the best to use ?
>>>  >
>>>  > Thanks.
>>>
>>>  Please don't feed the trolls...
>>>
>>>  --
>>>  Yours,
>>>  J.A. Terranson
>>>  sysadmin at mfn.org
>>>
>>>  If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human
>>>  beings, they should give serious consideration towards
>>>  setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than
>>>  consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which
>>>  the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the
>>>  first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and
>>>  elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction
>>>  of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic
>>>  and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely
>>>  wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out
>>>  the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
>>>
>>>  The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my
>>>  employers, associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the
>>>  opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a
>>>  problem to bitch about in the first place...
>>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>




More information about the NANOG mailing list